The European Flash Crash

If you haven’t read the 3 postings on this site concerning the Flash Crash, this latest piece won’t mean much. But if you have a moment, I’d read the three articles on the “Flash Crash” and then this piece listed on Dow Jones today…..where did they say that that program was sent to?

By LUKE JEFFS

LONDON Circuit breakers prevented sudden losses in five stocks Monday afternoon on the London Stock Exchange from causing a wider market crash, the exchange’s operator said.

The prices of five LSE-listed stocks BT Group PLC, Hays PLC, Next PLC, Northumbrian Water Group PLC and United Utilities Group PLC started to fall suddenly at 2 p.m. local time.

The cause is unknown at this stage but brokers who were watching the market at the time said yesterday it looked like a “fat finger” trade, where a trader pushes a wrong key or sequence of keys, or a glitch in a trading algorithm that automatically generates orders.

The impact of the sudden sell-off was limited however because the LSE’s automatic circuit breakers kicked in when the losses in these stocks neared 10% and trading these names was immediately suspended. The exchange then cancelled all sell orders on these stocks and reopened trading after five minutes, at which time the shares rebounded to their levels before the mini-crash in just a few minutes.

The FTSE 100, which had traded down 0.8% to 5138 between 12.45 p.m. and 1.15 p.m., was unaffected by the sudden fall of these five shares, hovering at the 5150 level throughout.

The London Stock Exchange Group PLC heralded the intervention as a small victory at a time when the European market model has been called into question following the May 6 flash crash when the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell nearly 1,000 points after a similar sell-off in a handful of stocks that wasn’t stopped.

“At around 14:00, our circuit breakers were triggered in a number of securities on the Exchange’s order book,” a spokesman for the LSE said. “These circuit breakers are built into the Exchange’s systems to track the prices at which automatic executions are occurring and will halt execution if certain price movement tolerances could be breached.”

The cause of the May 6 flash crash is being investigated by U.S. regulators but the fact that brokers could continue selling because different trading venues had different circuit breaker rules is believed to have been a factor. Circuit breakers have been triggered on a few occasions on U.S. exchanges since the flash crash.

A month ago Conservative Member of the European Parliament Kay Swinburne published a draft report in which she suggested that “post the ‘Flash Crash,’ all trading platforms stress-test their technology and surveillance systems” to ensure Europe isn’t prone to the factors that led to the U.S. crash in May.

BT Group, Hays and Northumbrian Water Group declined to comment while Next and United Utilities were unavailable for comment.

More at eFinancialNews.com

Write to Luke Jeffs at luke.jeffs@dowjones.net

Annuities and Guaranteed Income

After many attempts to refrain from making comments about the state of financial services companies in today’s market environment, an advertisement on CNBC struck me as being worth a more definitive look. Not long ago Mark Cuban in his blog wrote a story about Fidelity Investments guaranteeing income to its clients through the use of its own annuity product. This product would potentially provide income for life for the holder of the policy. Soon after Mark’s article Fidelity Life Insurance Company pulled the plug on their product. They would no longer offer this product to their clients. However, today I noticed that a television ad promoting the benefits of guaranteed income from Fidelity Investments was on the air. How could this be? Didn’t they decide to pull this product from the market? Surely this is some sort of oversight and it will be corrected quickly!

But nothing is as it seems at Fidelity anymore. After jotting down the 800 number to call about more information, I called Fidelity to find out that yes indeed they were offering the product and would I like to learn more about it?!!!! The representative that I talked to explained that Fidelity was offering this guaranteed income product, but it’s not Fidelity’s product, it’s either Mass Mutual’s or John Hancock’s. This seemed odd so I asked, “Why wouldn’t I buy the product from those companies rather than Fidelity?” The answer was an interesting and confusing one. The representative explained that, “unlike the other insurance companies we are not paid to sell insurance or annuities so Fidelity through their buying power cuts a deal with the other insurance companies to offer the product at a better price than what they can because we don’t have to pay agents their commissions. This means our rates are better!”

Really?